Content Policy

Purpose

Conspiracy Wiki exists to document, discuss, and analyze conspiracy theories — both those that remain unresolved and those that are partially confirmed or declassified. Our goal is to be a comprehensive reference, not an advocacy platform. Articles should inform readers, not persuade them.

What Is Allowed

Articles may cover any documented conspiracy theory, allegation, or speculative claim, provided the content is presented as theory or allegation rather than established fact. This includes:

• Documented historical conspiracies (confirmed by governments, courts, or investigations)
• Active conspiracy theories with sourced coverage in news media or academic literature
• Analysis of evidence for and against a theory
• Timelines of events related to a conspiracy
• Profiles of key figures and organizations connected to a theory
• Discussion of government involvement, whistleblower testimony, and declassified documents

What Is Not Allowed

The following content will be removed and may result in account suspension:

• Harassment or targeting of private individuals — do not publish personal information about private citizens
• Calls to action or incitement — articles must be informational, not calls to action against people or institutions
• Fabricated evidence — do not present invented quotes, documents, or events as real
• Spam or promotional content — articles exist to document theories, not advertise products or services
• Illegal content — anything that violates applicable law is prohibited
• Content targeting minors — no content involving minors in any harmful context
• Pornographic or sexually explicit content — Conspiracy Wiki is a research and reference platform. Sexually explicit material of any kind is strictly prohibited and will be removed immediately

Neutral Presentation

Ideally, articles should present theories neutrally — rather than asserting theories as fact or dismissing them outright. The Truth Meter exists for community credibility assessment; article text should not prejudge it.

Editing Standards

Every edit must include an edit summary describing what was changed and why. Edits that remove large amounts of content require justification. Repeated unexplained removals of content may be treated as vandalism. When editing another contributor's work, preserve the intent of the original article even when improving its accuracy or readability.

Sources

Adding sources is strongly encouraged but not required. When claims are sourced, use the Sources field in the article metadata to link to original reporting, government documents, academic papers, or on-record statements. Avoid linking to sites that themselves lack sourcing.

Disputes

If you believe an article contains inaccurate, harmful, or policy-violating content, use the Dispute button on the article page to flag it for community review. Disputed articles are reviewed by the community through a voting process — no single user controls the outcome. For substantive disagreements about article content, use the article's Discussion page.

Reporting Explicit or Inappropriate Content

Every article includes a Report button for flagging explicit, harmful, or policy-violating content. Use it if you encounter pornographic material, graphic violence, harassment, or anything else that violates this policy. Reports are reviewed promptly — flagged content is prioritised for admin attention and may be hidden pending review. You do not need an account to submit a report.

Enforcement

This wiki relies on community moderation. Admins may remove content, revert edits, or block accounts that repeatedly violate this policy. All edit history is preserved — nothing is permanently erased, and actions taken by admins are visible in the revision history.

Changes to This Policy

This policy may be updated as the wiki grows. Changes will be reflected here. Continued use of the wiki after a policy update constitutes acceptance of the revised terms.