Category File
Radiation
2 documented theories filed under this subject.
- Irradiating the Public Food SupplyFood irradiation began as a US Army programme co-sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission, and in 1963 the FDA approved irradiated bacon on data it had not read — then withdrew the approval in 1968 after reading it. Four New Jersey irradiation plants produced criminal convictions for lying to federal inspectors, including a former Atomic Energy Commission member. What the record does not show is scale: in January 2000 the GAO put the whole irradiated food supply at 97 million pounds a year, almost all of it spices.
- The Van Allen Belt ImpossibilityThis theory claimed that the Apollo missions could not have reached the Moon because the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth would have delivered lethal doses of radiation to the astronauts. In its strongest form, the argument states that any crewed lunar mission was physically impossible and that Apollo astronauts never traveled beyond low Earth orbit. The historical and scientific record shows that Apollo trajectories were planned to pass through weaker regions of the belts, that transit times were short, and that measured astronaut doses were far below lethal levels. The argument nevertheless became one of the most technically sounding and persistent moon-hoax claims.
- The Radium Girls Cover-upThe Radium Girls Cover-up was the belief that the illnesses and deaths of dial painters exposed to radium in the 1910s and 1920s were not only concealed by employers but shielded by a deeper scientific and industrial inner circle determined to preserve radium’s prestige. At the historical core of the case, companies and associated doctors did indeed deny danger, alter or suppress unfavorable findings, and in some instances blame the women’s conditions on syphilis or other causes. The stronger conspiracy version expanded this denial into a secret council of physicists, chemists, and industrial experts who allegedly coordinated the misdirection. Because radium occupied an exalted place in the culture of modern science, medicine, and beauty commerce, the case became one of the clearest examples of a workplace poisoning scandal being interpreted as organized scientific protectionism.