Category File
Advertising
2 documented theories filed under this subject.
- The Ears in the iPhoneThis theory claims that smartphones—and especially apps tied to Facebook, Instagram, Google, or Apple voice systems—listen continuously to private offline conversations and then use those recordings to serve hyper-targeted advertising. In stronger versions, the microphone is treated as a permanent commercial surveillance channel that silently converts speech into ad categories, even when users have not knowingly activated a voice assistant. The documented record is more mixed but narrower: researchers in a large 2018 study found no evidence that the apps they tested activated microphones or exfiltrated audio in the way users feared, though they did find screen capture and other forms of data extraction. Later lawsuits against Siri and Google Assistant involved allegations of accidental or unintended activation of voice assistants, which helped keep the broader “phone is listening” belief alive.
- Christmas Commercialization PlotThe Christmas Commercialization Plot was the belief that modern consumer Christmas was not an organic continuation of older holiday customs but a deliberate remaking of winter celebration by department stores, advertisers, illustrators, and mass retailers. In its strongest form, the theory held that the modern visual Santa—jovial, rotund, child-facing, gift-distributing, and tightly linked to store windows and shopping lists—was standardized to train children into desire and consumption. The theory drew power from a real historical process: the nineteenth-century remaking of Santa’s image through writers and illustrators, followed by the intensive use of Santa by department stores between the late nineteenth century and the 1920s. Under the conspiracy interpretation, this was not branding alone but psychological conditioning disguised as holiday magic.