Category File
1930s America
3 documented theories filed under this subject.
- The FDR Secret Disability PlotThe FDR Secret Disability Plot held that Franklin D. Roosevelt’s public disability story—paralysis after his 1921 illness—concealed a far more dangerous hidden condition: mental incapacity so severe that an inner circle of advisers, cabinet members, and physicians effectively ruled in his name. In this theory, Roosevelt’s known struggle with paralysis served as a visible explanation that distracted from a darker administrative reality. The historical core is real but different: Roosevelt’s disability was managed carefully in public, later health concerns were serious, and journalists often cooperated in minimizing visual evidence of his limitations. The conspiracy version extended concealment from the body to the mind, turning governance by advisers into governance without a truly functioning president.
- The Blood Donation PlotThe Blood Donation Plot was an early twentieth-century fear that organized blood collection and preserved transfusion systems were not being built solely for emergency medicine, surgery, or humanitarian care, but to supply hidden rejuvenation programs for the old and powerful. In its strongest form, the theory claimed that aging financiers, politicians, and billionaires would be sustained by the blood of the young while the public was told that donation served ordinary patients. The theory drew power from two real developments: modern blood storage and transfusion systems matured in the 1930s, and the idea that fresh blood could restore vigor had already circulated in medical and quasi-medical thought, including in the work of Alexander Bogdanov. The conspiracy version turned clinical innovation into elite vampirism by institution.
- The Lindbergh Baby Cover-upThe Lindbergh Baby Cover-up was the belief that the 1932 kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh Jr. was not fundamentally an outside abduction but a staged public distraction concealing a death within or near the family circle. In the strongest versions, the child was said to have been killed accidentally or deliberately by a family member, nurse, or trusted household insider, after which the kidnapping narrative was built to redirect suspicion outward. The theory grew from the extraordinary fame of Charles Lindbergh, the chaotic early investigation, the delayed discovery of the child’s body, and later doubts about whether Bruno Hauptmann acted alone or represented the true solution. Because the case became the “crime of the century,” it generated enough secrecy, pressure, and contradiction to sustain inside-job interpretations for generations.